- #ITERM SPLIT SCREEN INSTALL#
- #ITERM SPLIT SCREEN DRIVER#
- #ITERM SPLIT SCREEN SKIN#
- #ITERM SPLIT SCREEN FULL#
It by far has the best image handling of any terminal emulator I've ever used and has been my daily driver for a couple of years now. The default terminal of the Enlightenment desktop.
#ITERM SPLIT SCREEN INSTALL#
Cons: no background images (there's an issue open), no vertical splits without configuration, no drop down, and while it has packages for several distros ubuntu isn't one of them (have to manually install deps and compile from source). KittyĪ terminal that AFAICT was just written by one guy with a surprisingly rich feature set: has true color, horizontal splits, transparency, shows images, shell integration. Cons: no hot-keyed drop down window, no independent panes, handling of background images can be wonky. for kubuntu) has true color, tabs, background image, transparency. Cons: no built-in way to preview images, it's handling of background images can be wonky.
#ITERM SPLIT SCREEN FULL#
It has full true color support, a dropdown hotkey, transparency, background image, panes, tabs, shell integration. So here are a few terminals that are probably closest to iterm2 in terms of feature parity: Qterminal I cannot find a single linux terminal that completely matches this feature set (much less all the ones I didn't mention) but there are linux terminals that come pretty darn close, and can do things that iterm2 can't do (like set per window/pane background images). I haven't even come close to listing them all, although these are the ones I use/care about the most. Full support/integration for various shells (e.g.Here's a short list of iterm2 (v3) features: Linux terminals in general seem to be getting closer to parity with iTerm2. Some other worthy contenders not mentioned in the original answer are Tilix and Terminator (check them out!), and my top pick is still for the most part Not quite as polished as some of the others, but has a very full feature set, see my old review below for more details.
#ITERM SPLIT SCREEN SKIN#
The stock KDE terminal is a solid choice and in addition to a rich feature set it's the only terminal I know of that comes out of box with that recent MacOS-ish translucency blur onion skin effect (a.k.a. I'm not wild about the choice of configuring through dconf rather than just having a text file in $HOME/.config, but not the end of the world. Not on par with iTerm2 in terms of feature set, but a very solid choice for a daily driver. Tilixįantastic and polished terminal emulator, been my daily driver for a while now. It's a newer project but this may be the iTerm2 killer. If you're a ricer, this is the terminal emulator for you. The only other thing I want is a hotkey dropdown terminal, not the end of the world. One feature I miss is profiles, but you can always have multiple config files (author made the interesting choice of using Lua rather than ini/toml/yaml/json for the config file). Has GPU acceleration, built in multiplexer (tabs and splits), ligature support, built in imgcat support, background images, transparency, shell integration, almost everything one could want. My current picks for my favorite Linux iTerm2 replacements are, in no particular order: Wezterm I don't often have anything of importance running locally, but often do remotely.While I in general prefer GTK applications in terminal emulators the reigning champ Qt is being overtaken not by them but by projects eschewing traditional GUI toolkits entirely! My approach (not based on any particular insight) is to use iTerm tabs and panes to separate servers, and screen / tmux on the server to persist sessions. Personally, I'm used to tmux by itself at this point, so I've not leveraged this ability extensively - but if you are used to iTerm2 split panes, you can get the benefits of tmux (mostly screen-like session saving) with the iTerm aesthetics. ITerm2 can use tmux for it's split panes. Most terminal emulators send SIGHUP to all children which terminates them by default and thus you lose unsaved data (at least, shell and vim command history and other data stored in viminfo) and running processes and thus reopening means rerunning everything. With tmux it is normally as simple as reattaching session without losing anything. There is another advantage of tmux: what happens if you accidentally close iterm2? If you do it really by accident, you want to reopen everything again.
0 kommentar(er)
